What NFL Teams Share a Stadium?

MetLife Stadium

The National Football League (NFL) boasts 32 teams, but surprisingly, there are only 30 full-time NFL stadiums. This discrepancy arises from the concept of shared stadiums, where two teams call the same venue home. This practice offers a unique perspective on stadium management and fan culture, prompting questions about its benefits, challenges, and the future of such arrangements.

Currently, two sets of NFL teams share a stadium:

MetLife Stadium

History and Construction: Opened in 2010, MetLife Stadium replaced the aging Giants Stadium, serving as a joint project by the New York Giants and New York Jets. The construction cost approximately $1.6 billion, making it the most expensive stadium ever built at the time.

Home Teams: The New York Giants and New York Jets, two long-standing rivals in the NFL, share MetLife Stadium as their primary home field.

Interesting Facts: MetLife Stadium holds the record for the most consecutive sellout crowds in NFL history (136 games), and it has hosted numerous major events, including Super Bowl XLVIII and WrestleMania 35.

People also liked this content:

SoFi Stadium

History and Construction: Completed in 2020, SoFi Stadium stands as the newest and most technologically advanced NFL stadium. It was a joint venture between the Los Angeles Rams and Los Angeles Chargers, with construction costs exceeding $5 billion.

Home Teams: After relocating back to Los Angeles in 2016, the Rams found a permanent home in SoFi Stadium, along with the Chargers who arrived in 2017.

Interesting Facts: SoFi Stadium boasts a unique architectural design, with a translucent roof that can open and close depending on weather conditions. It has also hosted major events like Super Bowl LVI and College Football Playoff National Championship games.

Benefits and Challenges of Shared Stadiums

The concept of shared stadiums in the NFL presents both advantages and disadvantages. Let’s explore both perspectives of the issue:


Reduced Construction Costs: By sharing the financial burden, teams can save significantly on construction costs compared to building separate stadiums.

Increased Revenue Sharing: Sharing concessions, parking, and other revenue streams allows teams to maximize their profits and reinvest resources in other areas.

Improved Stadium Amenities: Shared stadiums often boast the latest technology and amenities, offering fans a more enhanced and immersive experience.


Scheduling Conflicts: Coordinating schedules for two teams can be a logistical nightmare, potentially leading to scheduling conflicts and inconveniences for fans.

Branding and Identity Issues: Maintaining separate team identities and branding within a shared stadium can be challenging, especially for rival teams.

Fan Rivalry and Division: Sharing a stadium can intensify existing rivalries and create divisions among fan bases, leading to potential conflicts and disruptions.

The Future of Shared Stadiums

While the current landscape of shared stadiums in the NFL is limited, the potential for growth exists. Several factors suggest the possibility of more teams opting for this arrangement:

Rising Construction Costs: As the cost of building new stadiums continues to climb, shared stadiums might become a more financially viable option for various teams.

Advanced Technology: Technological advancements can facilitate the seamless integration of two teams’ branding and identity within a shared stadium.

Shared Stadium Success Stories: The success of MetLife Stadium and SoFi Stadium demonstrates that shared stadiums can be profitable and provide a positive fan experience.

However, concerns and considerations must be addressed before widespread adoption becomes reality:

League Approval: The NFL needs to carefully review and approve future shared stadium proposals to ensure they comply with league regulations and promote fair competition.

Fan Sentiment: Understanding and mitigating potential negative impacts on fan experience, including scheduling conflicts and rivalry issues, is crucial.

Community Impact: The effects of shared stadiums on surrounding communities, including traffic congestion and economic development, require thorough evaluation.


Shared stadiums in the NFL represent an intriguing concept with both potential benefits and challenges. While the current landscape features only two examples, the future may hold more teams sharing stadiums, driven by rising construction costs, advanced technology, and successful existing models. However, careful consideration must be given to league approval, fan experience, and community impact before widespread adoption becomes a reality.

Ultimately, the success of shared stadiums hinges on finding a balance between financial viability, team identity, and fan satisfaction. As technology and collaboration continue to evolve, shared stadiums might offer a sustainable and innovative solution for the future of the NFL.


What are the advantages of shared stadiums?

Shared stadiums offer several advantages, including reduced construction costs, increased revenue sharing, and improved stadium amenities. By sharing resources, teams can save money on building and maintaining a stadium while offering fans a more luxurious and technologically advanced experience.

What are the challenges of shared stadiums?

The primary challenges of shared stadiums include scheduling conflicts, branding and identity issues, and fan rivalry and division. Coordinating schedules for two teams can be difficult, and maintaining separate team identities within a shared stadium can be challenging, especially for rivals. Additionally, sharing a stadium can intensify existing rivalries and create divisions among fan bases.

What is the future of shared stadiums in the NFL?

The future of shared stadiums in the NFL remains uncertain. While rising construction costs, advanced technology, and successful existing models suggest potential growth, concerns regarding league approval, fan sentiment, and community impact need to be addressed.

Leave a Comment